APC Hypermethylation as a Prostate Cancer Indicator

armored personnel carrier Hypermethylation as a prostatic gland pubic louse IndicatorEvaluation of armored personnel carrier Hypermethylation From Serum Samples as an Indicator for front man of Prostate genus cancer and Higher Gleason ScoreAbstractPurposeIn this prospective get wind it is aimed to identify role of hypermethlation compendium of APC ingredient from blood serum samples on detection of prostatic gland gland genus genus Cancer in patients with prostatic particular antigen level 2,5-10 ng/ml and its correlation with GS of the patientsMaterials and MethodsData from 142 patients underwent prostate biopsy with prostate specific antigen level of 2,5-10 ng/ml was analyse. Hypermethlation compendium of promoter vicinity of APC gene from serum samples was done via methlation specific PCR. Patients were concourseed as compulsory or negative depending on results of methylation depth psychology and compared for presence of prostate genus Cancer and GS distru bution. Sensitivity, specificity, positive prognosticative value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of methylation compend were calculated. P value of 0.05 is used for statistical significance.ResultsThere were 48 patients (33.8%) in methylation (+) group and 94 patients (66,2%) in methylation (-) group. Prostate crab louse was notice in 43 of 142 (30,2%) patients later the first biopsy and 32 of these patients were in methylation (+) group. predisposition and specificity of methylation analysis were 74,4% and 83,8%. PPV and NPV were 66.6% and 88.30 %. When GS distrubutions of the two groups analyzed patients in methylation (+) group were more likely to redeem senior higher GS compared to methylation (-) group(p=0,03).ConclusionsHypermethlation analysis APC gene from serum samples ready shown undimmedresults with its correlation with prostate malignant neoplastic disease and higher GS. Further studies onprediciton of survival of the fittest with long term follow up are submited to imprecate its value onprediction of survivalIntroductionProstate Cancer (PCa) is one of the most important medical problems of the male population as it is the most common solid neoplasm in atomic number 63 having the highest incidence of 202,100 cases in 2004 (1). It is not only common but besides a dangerous disease that it is the second most common cause of malignant neoplastic disease death in hands (2). These findings prove the grandness of detection of PCa. yet identifiying patients with clinic altogethery significant disease is an important issue, that is to treat patients that really need treatment while sparing ones that have silent disease.The European disarrange Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) trial concluded that 1,410 men would need to be screened and 48 additional cases of PCa would need to be enured to prevent one death from PCa (ERSPC-3). These findings point out that up-to-the-minute symptomatic tools are inadequate for screenin g and detection of clinically significant PCa (3).Epigenetic studies evolved in the era of urooncology in the last decade and deoxyribonucleic acidmethylation is widely analyse for certain urological malignancies especialy for PCa (4). Hypermethylation of promoter regions of tumor supresor genes results in gene silencing. This epigenetic change in APC gene promoter regions has been shown in cancerous and precancerous prostate tissues,serum, and urine of PCa patients and sensitiveness and specificity rates of 27-100% and 50-100% have been inform (5,6).However the current literature lacks studies that investigate corrolation of results of methylation analysis from serum samples and clinicopathologic properties (grade and stage of disease) of patients. This point should be verified to identify applicability of this method in clinical practice.In this prospective national it is aimed to identify role of hypermethlation analysis ofpromoter region of APC gene from serum samples on de tection of prostate cancer in a population of patients with prostate specific antigen level 2,5-10 ng/ml and its correlation with Gleason score (GS) of the patients.Patients and Methods.This study was approved by ethical committe of Turkish ministry of Health. Allpatients signed informed consent. The patients admitted to urology outpatient clinics of Ankara University Schol of Medicine with PSA level of 2,5-10 ng/ml and who were decided to undergo prostate biopsy were gnarly in the study. Serum samples were obtained from all patients prior to biopsy and 12 cores transrectal ultrasound steer prostate biopsy was performed by a single radiologist.Age, serum PSA level, prostate biopsy results were recorded and patients werefollowed regardless of the results of methylation analysis. Rebiopsy was suggested to patients with benign histology and persistant elevated PSA levels 6 months after the first biopsy. Patients with biopsy results of PCa were evaluted for staging and treated base on their stage. GS of the patients were evaluated in 3 groups GS6 , GS 7 and GS8-10.The patients were grouped as positive (methylation +) and negative (methylation -) based on methylation analysis results and compared with results of prostate biopsy. The primary outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of methylation analysis. As a tributary outcome measure the results were also compared with the GS groups.Genetic analysisDNA rootage Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples using a PureLink Genomic DNA Mini kit up (Invitrogen , catalog No. K1820-02) according to the manufacturers instructions and were stored at -20C until revision and MSPCR amplification. DNA integrity and quantity was assessed with agarose jelly electrophoresis and spectrophotometry, respectively. For this purpose, 1% agarose gel was used and 260 nm and 280 nm ocular density ratio values (OD260/OD280) were determined.Bis ulfite Modification and Methylation-Specific PCR of APC and GSTPI promoters The genomic DNA was modify by sodium bisulfite treatment using the CpGenomeTM DNA Modification Kit (S7820, Chemicon, Temecula, CA). The DNA promoter methylation status of APC and GSTPI genes were investigated by MSPCR using the specific primers to methylated and unmethylated promoters. The methylated and unmethylated control DNA were also subjected tobisulfite DNA modification and PCR analysis, and serves as positive controls formethylated and unmethylated DNA respectively. H2O was used as negative control for the PCR reaction. The PCR reaction was started with denaturation at 95C for 13 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95C for 30 s, 56C for 30 s, 72C for 30 s and 72C for 5 min.Statistical analysisContinuous variables were compared using the t test. Categorical variables were compared by the chi-square test..Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV werecalculated.ResultsProstate biopsy was performed in 142 patien ts. The humble age of the patients were 68,3 8,2 and mean ages of the methylated and unmethylated groups were not significantly different (67,8 vs 68,6 , p=0,47). There were 48 patients (33.8%) in group 1 and 94 patients (66,2%) in group 2. Prostate cancer was detected in 43 of 142 (30,2%) patients after the first biopsy and 32 of these patients were in methylation (+) group and 11 of them were in methylation (-) group. Based on these results, sensitivity and specificity of methylation analysis were 74,4% (95% CI 58.83 % 86.46 %) and 83,8% (95% CI 75.08 % to 90.47 %). PPV and NPV were 66.6% (95% CI 51.59 % to 79.59 %) and 88.30 % (95% CI 80.02 % to 94.00 %).When GS distrubutions of the two groups analyzed patients in methylation (+) group were more likely to have higher GS compared to methylation (-) group (p=0,041) and results are summarized in table 1. Second biopsy was performed in 12 (6 patients in each group) patients totally. At these second biopsies, PCa was observed in 4 patients, and all of them were in methylation (+) group.Based on the total results of first and second biopsies, sensitivity and specificity ,PPV and NPV were reevaluated. Sensitivity and specificity of methylation analysis were 76.6 % (95% CI 61.97 % to 87.68 %) and 87.3 % (95% CI 78.97 % to 93.29 %). PPV and NPV were 75.0 % (95% CI 60.4 % to 86.3 %) and 88.30 % (95% CI 80.02 % to 94.00 %). newsEpigenetic alterations, such as hypermethylation of prompter regions of tumorsupressor genes are associated with many tender tumor types and this type ofalteration have also emerged as markers for cancer risk assessment, cancerdiagnosis, and therapy monitoring in several different types of cancer (7-10).APC is a well-characterized tumor suppressor gene and it downregulates Wntsignaling by targeting the transcriptional coactivator beta-catenin for proteasomaldegradation and this prevents its association with the nuclear transcription factorTcell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor (11). The acti vation of Wnt pathway leads to deregulation of cell proliferation and specialism and is a common feature of many human cancers including prostate cancer (12-14).Detection of clinically significant PCa at an early stage is mollify a great challenge and current imaging modalities are a good deal not able to detect a tumor and biopsies whitethorn girlfriend the tumor focus. Role of gene promoter hypermethylation in prostatecarcinogenesis, has been analyse recently and promising results to improve PCadiagnosis has been established (5-7).In this study methylation analysis of promoter region of APC gene is performed prior to prostate biopsy in serum samples in order to evaluate the the role of this analysis on prostate cancer detection. Serum samples were obtained from all patients prior to biopsy and PCa was detected in siginificantly higher rates in patients with positive methylation analysis. In their study Yoon et al. showed that APC methylation levels were significantly higher i n PCa patients than in benign prostate hyperplasia patients. Moreover, APC hypermethylation was not only associated with the increased incidence of PCa but was also positively correlated with increased GS (15). This has also been shown in other studies indicating APC hypermethylation as a reliable predictor of PCa and of its aggressive feature (12,13). Similarly, in our study, methylation positive patients were found to have higher GS and GS7 was not observed in any patient with negative methylation analysis.Sensitivity and specificity of APC hypermethylation has been studied on prostatetissue samples and high sensitivity (89.3%) and specificity (98.1%) rates have been reported (15). In our study, sensitivity of 74,4% and specificity of 83,8% was found. These results are slightly lower compared to results of Yoon et al. and this may be due to source of DNA, that is higher rates might be reached when analysis is made through prostate tissue samples compared to serum samples. Addition ally the results may be effected from the detection method, including the primer design, reagents, detectors, equipment, and protocols, all of which potentially deviate the sensitivity and specificity.The important point of our study is making the analysis from serum samples toevaluate its role in clinical practice. The lack of such studies has been accent in previous trials conducted on tissue samples (15). Repat biopsies is an important issue in PCa diagnosis in the study of Trock et al. (16) APC methylation provided a very high NPV with a low percentage of false negatives,in a clinical cohort of men undergoing reiterate biopsy.In our study, repeat biopsy was performed in 12 patients (6 patients in each group) and all of the 4 patients with PCa detected in second biopsy were in the methylation positive group. Our study involves low number of repeat biopsies therefore push studies with higher number of patients evaluating role of hypermethylation analysis from body fluids shoul d be conducted on the topic of repeat biopsies.ConclusionPrediction of clinical significance of PCa is of clinicial importance andhypermethlation analysis of promoter region of APC gene from serum samples have shown promising results with its correlation with prostate cancer and higher GS. Further studies on prediciton of survival with long term follow up are inevitable to verify its value on prediction of survival.Conflict of interest no(prenominal) of the authors have any conflict of interestEthical standarts The study was approwed by ethical committe of Turkish Ministry of Health.References1. Boyle P, Ferlay J. Cancer incidence and deathrate in Europe 2004. Ann Oncol2005 corrupt16(3)481-8.2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin2008 Mar-Apr58(2)71-96.3. Schrder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al.Screening and prostate-cancermortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med 2009 Mar26360(13)1320-8.4. Veeck J, Esteller M J Mammary Gland B iol Neoplasia. Breast cancerepigenetics from DNA methylation to microRNAs. J Mammary Gland BiolNeoplasia. 2010 Mar15(1)5-17.5. Kang GH, lee S, Lee HJ, et al. Aberrant CpG island hypermethylation ofmultiple genes in prostate cancer and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. JPathol 2004 202 233406. Yegnasubramanian S, Kowalski J, Gonzalgo ML et al. Hypermethylation ofCpG islands in primary and metastatic human prostate cancer. Cancer Res2004 64 1975867. Moritz R, Ellinger J, Nuhn P, Haese A, Muller SC, Graefen M, Schlomm T, Bastian PJ. DNA hypermethylation as a predictor of PSA recurrence in patients with low- and intermediate-grade prostate cancer. antitumour Res 2013 Dec33(12)5249-54.8. Kim WJ, Kim YJ. Epigenetic biomarkers in urothelial bladder cancer. ExpertRev groyne Diagn 20099259-69.9. Hoque MO. DNA methylation changes in prostate cancer currentdevelopments and next clinical implementation. Expert Rev Mol Diagn20099243-57.10. Ushijima T. Detection and variant of altered met hylation patterns incancer cells. Nat Rev Cancer 20055223-31.11. Rai K, Sarkar S, Broadbent TJ, et al. DNA demethylase activity maintainsintestinal cells in an undifferentiated state following neediness of APC. Cell2010142 930-42.12. Jeronimo C, Henrique R, Hoque MO, et al. A quantitative promotermethylation profile of prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2004108472-8.13. Bastian PJ, Ellinger J, Wellmann A, et al. Diagnostic and prognosticinformation in prostate cancer with the help of a small set of hypermethylatedgene loci. Clin Cancer Res 2005114097-106.14. Gavert N, Ben-Zeev A. beta-Catenin signaling in biological control andcancer. J Cell Biochem 2007102820-8.15. Hyung-Yoon Yoon, Young-Won Kim, Ho Won Kang, et al. PyrosequencingAnalysis of APC Methylation Level in Human Prostate Tissues A MolecularMarker for Prostate Cancer. Korean J Urol. 2013 Mar54(3)194-198.16. Trock BJ, Brotzman MJ, Mangold LA, et al. Evaluation of GSTP1 and APCmethylation as indicators for repeat biopsy in a high-risk cohort of men withnegative sign prostate biopsies. BJU Int. 2012 Jul110(1)56-62Table 1. GS distrubutions of the two groups