Argumentative Essay

Student NameInstructor NameAssignmentDateThe Right to MonitorIn The Right to Be Let lone(prenominal) author Barry Glazer attempts to convince readers that the American giving medicine activity is all overstepping its boundaries and obstructive on the rights of citizens . His main personal computer address line is that government enforce[s] regulations that constrain our lives and crusade our freedoms Glazer considers much(prenominal) actions as sobriety checkpoints and building permits as nothing besides governmental red tape and inconveniences and invasion of rights for citizens much exchangeable , and including , himselfHowever , are the things that Glazer complaining about(predicate) re tout ensembley that outstanding of deal in the larger dodge of things ? Are his points validated ? Are civil rights , gua ranteed rights under our makeup and vizor of Rights beingness denied or abused by government officials and law of nature officers ? I m sure that we could easily say yes in several instances that we personally know of , as Glazer has make , but in the larger scheme of things , if analyzed , are governmental regulations real that big of a deal or does their existence real help to keep the freedoms that we are guaranteed in placeGlazer states , There is no reason for the government to interfere in our lives if our behavior does not adversely affect otherwises if on that point is no ready necessity for such interference First of all , the execration does not even make much sense . second , there is a point here , I remember , and that is that Glazer believes that the government should not interfere in a private citizens living if that person s behavior does not stock warrant it . Then he goes on to provide the illustration of a terminally ill person wanting to displume self-annihilation . How does thi! s action not affect any iodine ? How does finale one owns life not warrant action by soulfulness ? If the government were NOT to act on something of this bore-hole , it would be ridiculed , sued , and hung out to dry since one of the functions of the government is to nurse its hatful . Keeping them alive certainly seems to be alert in this process , so Glazer s product line that I should be allowed to kill myself certainly sets his argument up to be questionedThe close point that Glazer makes to support his overall argument is that the government should also stay out of an individual s life if there is no reason to believe he is doing reproach . The Bill of Rights protects us from unlawful searches and seizures Glazer then goes on to recollect an incident of sobriety check point procedures to back up this point . The weakness in this softenicular part of the argument falls within the realm of common senseThe police do have the right to pull someone over if they believe that that particular individual poses a threat to other dealing or if there is probable cause . With inebriated operate being on the top of list of gratis(p) deaths , to a greater extent people actually gain from this practice than are inconvenienced or bothered by the confusion of performing tricks...If you want to feature a full essay, dedicate it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper