.

Monday, December 23, 2013

The Tort Of Rylands And Fletcher Is A Specie Of Nuisance And Negligence. Critically Assess This Statement

The idea that the rule in Ry knock downs v Fletcher is a money of the torts of nuisance and thoughtlessness is an interesting concept. This essay aims at critically assessing the tort of Rylands v Fletcher as a funds of the torts of heedlessness and nuisance by carefully examining the relationships between these torts and the role of Rylands v Fletcher in the development of each of these torts. The rule as arrange out by Justice Blackburn is this: “The person who for his own use brings on his land and collects and keeps on that point anything likely to do flightiness if it ladders, must keep it in at his peril, and, if he does non do so, is prima facie answerable for all the damage which is the intrinsic solution of its escape.” To succeed in an action on this tort there must be land and accumulation on the land of something on the land. That thing accumulated must be a non-natural use of the land and there must be an escape of the thing which has cr eated some liability. For instance in the grapheme of in Humphries v. Cousins, a drain which began on the suspect’s expound passed infra other houses and received their drainage and hence returned under the plaintiff’s expound and passed beneath the plaintiff’s house.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
The return drain beneath the defendant’s premises was decayed and allowed drainage to escape which passed into the plaintiff’s premises. The defendant was ignorant even of the existence of the return drain. He was held liable(p) for nuisance. It is probable, however, that the principle of Rylands v. Fletcher though no t referred to in the slip of piece of musi! c would justify the decision, as suggested in Winfield on Torts. It is because of the elements needed to move up this tort that it has been argued that the rule in Rylands v Fletcher is a specie of the torts of nuisance and negligence. The relationship between Rylands v Fletcher and nuisance is discussed. villainy is defined as an activity or a substantial ground of affairs causing a substantial and...If you trust to thump a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment